India shall be liberated in the year 1975. We must grasp this belief and must not slacken it.
Depicting pessimism is revisionism. In the writings of Paris Commune, it has been written that revisionists always try to portray losses in a big way. In a revolutionary war, victory is associated with losses. Comrades of Vietnam are fighting a bitter battle, they are embracing martyrdom.
The law of growth of development is, at a certain stage of development, everything breaks down, new beginning then starts from one. This is unity of opposites. Magurjan has happened. In our country, struggle has ended after assuming a new phase, only to begin from a new stage. This can be termed as an incubating period. There is no place for disappointment, because struggle shall start from a higher form.
We must tell the landless-poor peasants to launch attack upon the state machinery and give them total politics. We must tell them of Magurjan. Then, the poor-landless peasants will decide, whether they would annihilate class enemy or snatch arms. This is true for Bengal and whole of India. Only propagating annihilation of class enemy is nothing but economism. Where not a single class enemy has been annihilated, we should tell these words there.
The essential point of Chairman’s report – No revolution is possible without landless-poor peasants. In revolution, leadership of poor peasant is highly imperative.
(March 1971, –– Deshabrati, 5 December 1972. Discussion with comrades.)
