For Young India, For a new India

Vinod Mishra is no more among us.

Against the forces of national subjugation and all sorts of reaction, VM was the commander-in-chief of Indian people's battle for a genuine national liberation and consistent democracy.

In an otherwise dark and confused atmosphere prevailing in the wake of saffron offensive, real danger of Congress revival, degeneration of centrist politics and left opportunism, CPI(ML) led by VM emerged as a centre of hope for nation's life, aspirations of the toiling and oppressed masses and expectations of democratic and patriotic intelligentsia.

He was the greatest Marxist thinker of our times. He was the unparalleled theoretician of the Indian path of revolution in the 75 year history of Indian communist movement. Under his leadership the CPI(ML) was emerging as the conscience keeper of the Indian communist movement.

Then he was a shrewd tactician, excellent organiser and an exceptionally popular mass leader too. It was his resolve to establish the Indian left, otherwise limited to the periphery of the national map, at the centrestage of Indian politics by rooting it in the strategic Hindi-Urdu belt. He was heading for making communist movement a real contender for power freeing it from the course of tailing behind the ruling class parties.

Along with the revolutionary peasant movement, he regarded student youth movement as a particular feature of CPI(ML) movement. In the wake of extreme opportunism, impotence and disintegration of the opposition parties, he often used to call on the youth to rise as the force of true revolutionary opposition against the offensive of right reaction. In fact, his deep faith on youth potential was a product of, besides theoretical understanding, his own experience as a youth grown up in a highly momentous phase of Indian history.

Brought up in a worker's colony at Kanpur, the talented son of a clerk, Vinod Kumar Mishra traversed the journey from a rationalist-atheist position to a Marxist one in a short span of time. And then he jumped into the storms of revolutionary struggles giving up his engineering career.

Barbaric repression in jail, police bullets, 22 years of underground political life, when he was almost regularly brushing past the death, nothing could deter him. Though death of Naxalism had already been proclaimed, he picked it from the ashes and established as the revolutionary stream of Indian communist movement on the national political landscape.

His life as a revolutionary student leader is an ideal for the youth. We get its glimpse in his memoirs of Durgapur RE College. He longed to see youth movement full of that revolutionary spirit. Remembering those stormy days he wrote: “On our part we worked for breaking the regimented life of a 'professional' education system and for bringing forth students' voice and their participation in running the college affairs; we did all in our capacity to foster a revolutionary progressive culture among students; we strove for educating in communist ideology and revolutionary politics a specific category of students who had nothing but the individual career as their life-mission; we did our best to integrate students with the life and struggles of workers and working people; we roused them in struggles against injustice, against anti-social activities, and against police atrocities.”

In contrast to romantic revolutionism and careerism, he stood for a firm commitment towards revolution. In his Durgapur memoirs he again noted, “We neither advocated nor practised Che's theory of urban guerilla actions, nor did any 'Kaka'-style super hero emerge from among us. We always remained loyal to the Party mainstream.”

He witnessed the same ideal in the life and martyrdom of Comrade Chandrashekhar. Inaugurating the third national conference of AISA, he said, “Chandrashekhar was not a romantic revolutionary but a vanguard conscious of his mission.”

He was very serious about ideological tasks of student youth movement, particularly in its post-Soviet collapse phase. Against social-democratic and fashionable postmodernist ideas he very much emphasized deep study of Marxism, grasping its revolutionary essence and defending it through its enrichment.

He always attacked caste-based manipulations. In his address to the AISA convention in Allahabad, he said, “Many people say that even among students one has to take recourse to caste-based mobilisation so as to win union elections. This has been called social engineering. If student movement becomes dependent on such caste equations it will lose its vanguard role. You have to fight against all such negative tendencies existing in the society and take new light into the society.”

In 'India of my dreams', he wrote, “In India of my dreams, glorification of pariahs as harijans will end and dalits will cease to be a category. Castes shall dissolve into classes with each of their members having their individual identity.”

For student youth movement, he always emphasized the need to adapt to the changing circumstances. He persisently advocated for autonomy to youth movement. Addressing the second national conference of AISA in Delhi, he said, “Our party believes in pointing out only the general course that the student-youth movement should take. Owing to their distinguished features, their youthful dynamism, students and youth shall traverse this course in their own peculiar way. It is neither possible nor desirable to dictate every step in advance.”

In the same conference he said, “A proper combination of the revolutionary spirit of 70's and the tactical expertise of today provides the key to your advance; and this you shall never forget.”

In the parallel student youth assembly held in Patna, in a different context, he said, “present movement is continuation of the positive legacy of JP Movement.”

But he regarded integration with the toiling masses for social change as the touchstone of revolutionary character of student youth movement. In the Delhi conference of AISA, he said, “Just as the revolutionary character of a youth is determined by his integration with the toiling masses, so also the revolutionary credentials of a student-youth organisation depend very much on its active role in the struggles for social change.”

Again he wrote in the introduction to Bhagat Singh's “Why I am an Atheist”: “Bhagat Singh advised the youth political activists to study Marx and Lenin, work among the working class and peasantry and impart class consciousness to them.”

He repeatedly underlined the crucial role of students in democratic movements. Addressing the 3rd conference of AISA, he said, “AISA must stand in solidarity with all democratic struggles and oppose all anti-people policies irrespective of whether the colour of the government is saffron, green or even red.”

Again, in his last call, he wrote: “All our mass organisations, particularly the youth front, should take bold initiatives on all issues of people's concern and strive to march ahead of all others. The days of closed-door conferencing are over. This is the time for all round initiatives. In history the issues of major significance are only resolved on the streets.”

And above all, he laid much stress on the vanguard role of student and youth in struggle against the increasing imperialist onslaught on our sovereignty.

Addressing the Patna Conference of AISA he said, “Despite Swadeshi rhetoric the pace of mortgaging the country's economy to the multinationals has only become faster. It is the foremost duty of AISA to mobilise students in anti-imperialist struggles.”

Vinod Mishra was a great patriot. On special request from 'The Telegraph', he wrote a magnificent article laying down the foundations of progressive nationalism. It is unique in depth and in sweep of its content as well as in beauty of its style. It appears to be prologue to the epic of his great patriotic dream of 'discovery of a New India' as opposed to the ruling class vision in Nehruvian 'Discovery of India'. He wrote, “India of my dreams shall rise in the community of nations as a country which the weakest of the neighbours shall not fear and which the most powerful country in the world shall not be able to threaten or blackmail. This India will rank among the first five countries of the world in economic prowess as well as in Olympic tallies.”

Like Bhagat Singh, his patriotism was identical with genuine liberation of great Indian people. In the same article he wrote, “Finally, for me the mother of all dreams is my motherland where political liberty of each of its citizens will be valued most; where dissent will be considered legitimate.”

Again he wrote in the same article, “And thus I dream of a great resurgence of rational ideas where the human essence alienated in the form of God shall retrieve itself. This great reformation of human minds shall accompany a social revolution where the producers of wealth shall also be the masters of their produce.”

That's why he said that in the entire freedom movement if anyone deserves to be called 'national hero', it is no one but Bhagat Singh.
Vinod Mishra was the brightest star of post-independence India like Bhagat Singh was the supernova of enslaved India.

Vinod Mishra is Hero of the New Nation.

Lal Salaam beloved comrade VM, the immortal hero of Indian revolution.

Other than politics, which to me means the medium revealing the intricacies of society, I take a great deal of interest in cosmology where the universe unfolds itself in infinite space and time; where galaxies fast recede into the ever-disappearing frontiers of universe away from each other; where stars emerge, glow and explode to death; and where, quite apparently, motion is the mode of existence of matter.

Motion, i.e., change and transformation – always from a lower to a higher order – also, incidentally, forms the mode of existence of human society. No idea is absolute, no society is perfect. Whenever a society has been conceived as the embodiment of the absolute idea, shock waves emerging from deep within have shaken the very foundations. And then amidst the despair all around new dreams arise. Some dreams never come true as they are wild fantasies of human mind, the 'mind-in-itself'. The few which are realized are essentially abstract creations of human mind, the 'mind-for-it-self. Nonetheless, dreams, whether wild or plausible, have remained the source of human endeavour since perhaps the origin of humanity itself.

India of my dreams is essentially an integral India where a Pakistani Muslim won't have to procure a visa in search of the roots of his evolution; where, likewise, for an Indian the great Indus Valley Civilization shall not fall in a foreign country; and where a Bengali Hindu refugee will finally shed away the bitter memories of Dacca and a Bangladeshi Muslim will not be hounded as a foreign national in India.

Sounds like BJP? But then the BJP has only thrived upon the great division of the country – between a Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India, albeit not so 'pure'. As BJP continues to stretch this division to extremes with all the disastrous consequences, great thinkers will surely arise in all the three countries and remould the public opinion for a brotherly reunion. And, be sure, that will be the doomsday for the forces like BJP.

In the India of my dreams, a Ganga and a Cauvery, and a Sindhu and a Brahmaputra will freely flow into each other and the morning shall dawn to the jugalbandi of great musical tunes of India. Some statesman will then compile his notes into a “Re-Discovery of India”.

India of my dreams shall rise in the community of nations as a country which the weakest of the neighbours shall not fear and which the most powerful country in the world shall not be able to threaten or blackmail. This India will rank among the first five countries of the world in economic prowess as well as in Olympic tallies.

India of my dreams shall have a secular state which shall rest upon the principle of 'Sarva Dharma Varjttah' rather than 'Sarva Dharma Sambhav'. While not interfering with the individual's faith, the state shall actively cultivate the scientific and rational world outlook.

Religion, as has rightly been said, is the expression of man's powerlessness towards his environment. Its abolition therefore demands a thoroughgoing change in the material and spiritual conditions of life where man can stand up to acquire mastery over his environment. Whenever the conservative philosophical systems have burdened the people as deadweights, there have always come up in India great reformation movements. And thus I dream of a great resurgence of rational ideas where the human essence alienated in the form of God shall retrieve itself. This great reformation of human minds shall accompany a social revolution where the producers of wealth shall also be the masters of their produce.

In India of my dreams, glorification of pariahs as harijans will end and dalits will cease to be a category. Castes shall dissolve into classes with each of their members having their individual identity.

In India of my dreams, women shall constitute 50% of representative assemblies. Love marriages will be the rule and the divorce easier to obtain. Children will not know any misery and looking after them will be more the responsibility of the state than parents.

In India of my dreams, every town will have its cafeterias where intellectuals shall have hot discussions over cups of cold coffee. There some anguished soul can gaze through the plumes of rising smoke conjuring up images of their heart-throbs while many insatiable hearts can be captivated by the interpretations of varied works of art and literature. While no work of art and literature will be subjected to state censorship, smoking shall be strictly prohibited everywhere, except, of course, the coffee houses.

To return to the original theme, in India of my dreams, an Indian spaceship will wade through the deep space while Indian scientists and mathematicians will be working out equations integrating into a whole the fundamental forces of nature.

Finally, for me the mother of all dreams is a motherland where political liberty of each of its citizens will be valued most; where dissent will be considered legitimate and where Tiananmens of the system will be handled by the morally strong statesmen and unarmed forces of people's militia.

India of my dreams is built upon the fundamental processes at work within the Indian society and for whose realization many like me are committed to the last drop of their blood. □

(Written on special request for The Telegraph on its 10th anniversary)

I came to Bengal as a student in RE College, Durgapur, in the middle of 1966 at the age of 19 years. The College had a system of enrolling upto 50% of students from among those who had qualified in IIT entrance exams, and thus there was a fair share of non-Bengali students from different corners of India.

My father was a clerical employee in a defence enterprise and we lived in a labour colony of Kanpur. Ours was a lower middle class family having no connections with landed property. Beginning from a rationalist-theist position at a tender age, I had a short stint with Sarvodaya movement in the early '60s, and by the middle of '60s under the influence of workers' struggles and by nature of living contacts with them, was drawn towards communism. Kanpur then had a communist MP in S M Bannerjee and MLA of our area too was a communist trade unionist, Sant Singh Yusuf.

The college atmosphere was quite oppressive and students were forced to live a regimented barrack life. No political or student union activities were allowed.

Once when the authorities came to know that a student was reading Marx's book in his hostel room, a thorough search was conducted and the student was threatened with rustication. Only once in 1965 some students had tried to organise a strike and it had simply collapsed. This had led to further hardening of attitude on the part of the authorities.

Annual elections were held for the Gymkhana body, which was supposed to continue itself in routine cultural activities as approved by the authorities representatives there. Broad majority of students were not interested in politics, they were only concerned with their career and with the petty-bourgeois ways of life. Actually the students of RE College were highly disliked by the local working class population mainly because of the ruffian activities of a section of students outside the college campus.

This was the state of affairs in a college in the heart of West Bengal, which was otherwise bursting with the left upsurge.

In the humanities class when we were asked to write a piece on rupee devaluation that had just taken place, in my section Ravichandran and myself wrote it condemning the US pressure and were branded as only leftists by the teacher.

Ravichandran, a bright student from Tamil Nadu, later on became a Party wholetimer and spent a few years in West Bengal jails. Afterwards he rejoined studies and while doing his M. Tech. at Kanpur came under the influence of CRC. At present he is working in some research institute in Bangalore and I don't know his present political stand. Anyway, he was a close comrade of mine in college days.

Despite authority's presence, seven or eight of us joined together and made plans to contact the CPI(M) outside, of course, secretly.

There existed a big gap between Bengali and non-Bengali students; rather a tension prevailed among them, and I, being a non-Bengali had obvious disadvantages to begin with. I quickly learned the language and in a short period my friends circle was mainly composed of Bengali students. Some Bengali students who nurtured a hatred towards non-Bengalis, in course of time, became my bosom friends.

While speaking of non-Bengali comrades I must refer to Com. Omswaroop. A research fellow in our college who joined the movement and became a Party whole timer, he was murdered in cold blood by CPI(M) goons in 1971 at Durgapur in a most cowardly manner. He was a bright intellectual and the best among us in communist qualities.

Then there was Brij Bihari Pandey, my childhood friend. He joined the college and the Party along with me in similar circumstances. At present he is an important Party functionary of ours.

To resume, just when we had established primary contacts with the CPI(M), Naxalbari occurred and overnight we all turned into 'Naxalites'. At this stage we conducted secret revolutionary propaganda among students and could influence a tiny minority. Side by side, we established contacts with worker comrades outside who had come out of CPI(M), addressed host of GB meetings of workers in the township and engaged in fierce debates with CPI(M) leaders and cadres.

Before I proceed, let me tell you about student comrades from earlier batches who joined the Party and played an important role in the 'Naxalite' movement. Shanti Chatterjee was one who was the Party incharge in Tripura during 1971-72. I have never met him and I don't know his present whereabouts. Probol Roy, a quite sober and sincere comrade, from whose house CM was arrested, too belonged to our college. I was quite close to him but I am in dark about his present stance. Ashish Das Gupta was a year senior to me. He didn't take much interest in college affairs. He was very knowledgeable and promising Marxist scholar. I haven't met him for a long time but as far as I know, he is associated with Shanti Pal group of CPI(ML).

It was 1968. Gymkhana elections were round the corner and we decided to contest and utilise this forum for our political aims. Though we didn't have much political support among students, in our individual capacity we were quite popular. We won the elections capturing all the vital posts of office bearers. I too was elected a member, the only non-Bengali student to do so.

We started changing the orientation and complexion of the cultural programs. Still the authorities could not sense anything. We changed the name of the college magazine to 'Vanguard' and its first issue (brought out keeping the teacher incharge, in dark) carried references of Chairman Mao and scientific socialism etc. in its editorial. With the distribution of the magazine all hell broke loose. We had fired the first salvo and were prepared to face the consequences.

The Principal called the Gymkhana members and threatened them of rustication. Some members, who were not our men, retreated; but Devashish, Asit, myself and others owned their responsibility. Devashish was a good singer and a cultural artist who later on became a Party wholetimer and worked in the countryside for a few years. Asit was an important Party organiser and worked for many years in the countryside.

On the students front, general students too could not digest this sudden heavy dose of politicisation and basing on their apathy and disapproval, anti-communists among the students organised a protest demonstration that culminated in burning the copies of Vanguard' at a central place. We were just five or six comrades and hence could not offer resistance to them. But we raised counter slogans in support of Mao and China while the procession was going on. On their way back the processionists raided our hostel and we were beaten up.

Anyway, this was the first open political move and an open defiance of authorities. We were awaiting our rustication orders when an event changed the whole course.

For lack of required percentage of attendance, the authorities prepared a blacklist of students who were not permitted to take the examinations. The list contained the names from both the camps and thus it became a common student issue. Students in general had pent up grievances for a long time and this issue took it to a flash point. A students strike was called and it was a complete success. All threats and intimidation on the part of the authorities failed to break the strike. Movement had reached a stalemate and one day when the entire teaching staff was holding a session we organised a gherao. It continued from morning 10 am to late in the night. At 3 am when a very few students were left, the teachers broke the cordon and went away. At this point, the movement took a violent turn. In no time hundreds of students, armed with sticks and rods, came out of their hostels and marched towards the staff quarters. Houses of the authorities were attacked. Police was called but ultimately the panic-stricken authorities conceded to all our demands, which apart from withdrawing the blacklist included a sort of students' representation in running the college affairs etc. and college was closed sine-die.

During those days we were quite influenced by the ongoing movement of French students. Characterizing the contradiction between the authorities and the students as that between bourgeoisie and proletariat, ideas like controlling the campus, running a parallel administration by students etc. were very much in vogue in our circles. Our comrades did take full initiative and attempted to impart an ideological orientation to it on the lines mentioned above, but on the whole, the movement was more of a spontaneous nature and no such recognizable set of leaders or a definite ideology could claim to have guided it.

This marked the end of the first phase of students' movement in our college and thereafter the authorities went into a defensive position. Our college was thus put into the mainstream of student and political activities of West Bengal.

Our rustication issue got buried down in the thick of the movement. However, at the persistence of circle of students close to us, the content of the next issue of 'Vanguard' was considerably toned down.

Full fledged and open political activities began in the college. In the beginning of 1969 we organised protest marches in township thoroughfares against police firing on Kashipur and Ichhapur workers, and organised progressive cultural functions etc. Students were mobilised to express solidarity with workers' struggles in townships. Advanced comrades continued addressing GB meetings of workers. In addition, we started a night school in a bustee area where college students visited and provided education to poor children. This was taken as a means for interaction with the people.

Our conflicts with the CPI(M) outside were confined to debates with their leaders and cadres where Lenin's 'State and Revolution' was our favourite weapon in silencing them down. However, CPI(M) was getting quite worried over our activities particularly because it had no foothold in the college.

Within the college, contradictions with anti-Communist lumpen type students became quite acute as they could not tolerate our activities. During a progressive drama function they attacked us and we had planned to pay them back immediately after examinations. By that time several of us had made up their minds to give up studies and work as Party wholetimers.

However, again an unexpected event occurred.

On 1 June, two college students were arrested by the police from a nearby square as they were protesting the beating of an innocent truck driver by the traffic policeman. When the news came to the college, hundreds of students armed with rods ransacked the nearby police post, beat up all policemen who came into sight and blocked the GT Road demanding unconditional release of the arrested students. Armed police forces started arriving on the scene threatening to fire but students refused to move. When the inspector came for talks he was immediately surrounded and virtually dragged inside the college campus. We behaved well with him and lectured him on Mao's thought. Message was sent to police authorities that the inspector will be released only after the students were released. By evening, the administration released the students and we in turn, released the inspector unharmed. Students were foil of joy over the victory, but later we realised that it was just the beginning.

The next day morning, hundreds of armed policemen encircled the college from all sides. Within fifteen minutes hundred or so of us came out and started throwing stones. Without any warning whatsoever, the police opened fire killing a student, Prakash Poddar, and then they marched into the college where examinations were in progress. From ten in the morning to four in the evening, they beat up anyone they caught hold of, smashing the doors of the rooms where students had hidden themselves. Over a hundred students, teachers and other staff members were injured and admitted to hospital. Frantic telephone calls to the district administration and the Home Ministry by the college authorities went in vain. Their pet reply was that the police had rebelled and your students were responsible for it. At 4 pm with the arrival of EFR, the policemen left the place.

That was my first ever experience of facing a police firing and witnessing police brutality at such a large scale. I remember having taken a pledge with closed fists to take revenge, and once and for all, that was the end of all my hesitation to join the revolutionary movement as a professional revolutionary.

Well, it was a left front Government, then headed by Mr. Jyoti Basu. Students of Presidency College and Jadavpur University organised protest demonstrations condemning the police firing. Our protest in front of Jyoti Basu's residence was again lathicharged.

“Statesman” wrote an editorial titled 'Red Star over Durgapur'. From the form of the 1 June incidents, CPI(M) too felt that Naxalites had gained considerably in the college and thus allowed the so-called police rebellion to teach us a lesson. In reality, these were exaggerated readings of the situation. The whole struggle was a struggle of general students arising out of their natural urge to protest against injustice, and their wrath against the police. In the forefront of the struggle stood, apart from us, those students too with whom we were in a state of antagonism. The two arrested students were general students as was Prakash, and it was a spontaneous outburst of the student community. Instead of teaching us a lesson, this event antagonised the students against the CPI(M) and it really turned the college into a red bastion of ours. Our ranks swelled to a great extent and we emerged as the leaders of the students as a whole.

At this point, certain lumpen type of elements who could no longer resist us on their own, established contacts with CPI(M) outside and the CPI(M) in its bid to get a foothold in the college started harbouring them. These elements though isolated from the students, started creating trouble with the backing of a large number of CPI(M) activists from outside. Finally, when it crossed all limits of tolerance, we gave them a good drubbing. CPI(M) with its hundreds of activists and supporters which included large number of workers, attacked us in retaliation and in order to avoid a blood-bath we made a retreat.

Some fifteen of us were, however, caught by them, beaten and kept in confinement at workers' quarters for two days. We engaged into sharp debates with the CPI(M) leaders, and resorted to a hunger strike demanding our release. Quite strangely, I found that the workers and a section of the CPI(M) cadres didn't like all this confinement. They very sympathetically attended to our injuries and with tears in their eyes, requested us to break the hunger strike. Ultimately, the leadership released us unharmed.

In the college campus, in the mean time, the lumpen section created white terror by mercilessly beating up even our distant sympathisers. We continued our preparations secretly and after two months or so launched a swift counter attack beating up the hoodlums and ending the reign of white terror. Hundreds of students came out cheering on the streets. The CPI(M) attacked from outside but after hours of bombing made a retreat. Police rounded up over 500 students to arrest the leaders but our comrades had already made good their escape. Since then the college campus was completely controlled by us. We established what we then called the 'red terror'. The CPI(M) stopped meddling and the ring leaders just fled away.

Thus began the third and the last phase of our movement.

We organised a political strike against US aggression on Cambodia and it was a total success. A campaign was organised against obscene and cheap literature. All rooms were searched and such literature was burnt at open places. Students were told to behave properly with the local population and scores of batches of students went to the workers colonies to do political propaganda.

Red flag was hoisted atop the college building in a political gathering of over 2,000 students. Whenever we came to know about any workers' struggle, hundreds of students joined in support.

It was perhaps May of 1970. By that time several of our cadres had left for the countryside or for other working class areas. I had taken the mantle of party leader and apart from looking after the college affairs, had to oversee the general work of Durgapur Party organisation too.

Com. Dhurjati Buxi was one senior comrade who had left the college as a Party wholetimer and at present he is an important Party functionary of ours.

In the college, Gautam Sen was another leader who was a good orator and had the best leadership qualities amongst us. We did have certain differences occasionally but we would always resolve them through discussions. Latter on he became a Party wholetimer. At present, as per my information, he is running a group 'Mazdoor Mukti' and a magazine of the same name from Calcutta.

During the reign of 'red terror' we inflicted varying degrees of punishment on reactionary and lumpen elements, in particular, against those who were ringleaders during the 'white terror'. This process reached its climax when Madhusudan, the main ringleader, returned offering an apology. He had earned deep hatred of students and was beaten to death by a mob of students. That was the end of our 'red terror' as the police intervened and the college was closed for an indefinite period. I had already outrun my period as a student leader and thereafter there was no going back.

In retrospect, I feel that during the period of 'red terror' we committed some excesses and the blame should primarily lie on me. Madhu, after all, was a student and had come back for pursuing his studies, I could not imagine that he will die after the beating. Often I repent his death because had I tried, I could have dissuaded my militant comrades and saved him.

Four years back, I accidentally met a class fellow of mine during a train journey. He is now an engineer in Jessop Factory. During college days he was in the opposite camp just next to Madhu on our hit list. While recalling the old days, in friendly discussion I told him that I feel sorry for the excesses in those days. In response he consoled me back saying that you people did many good things and actually we did many wrong things and deserved the punishment. With great passion he told me “Mishra, I feel proud of you”.

Did he sum up the present feelings of the then generation of students? I don't know. Dark clouds over the years have overshadowed the 'Red Star'. The general disgrace which our movement suffered in West Bengal at the hands of our political opponents, the powerful media, the tribe of ex-Naxalites and our own undoings, had made it difficult to sort out the specific practices and achievements in particular cases.

On our part we worked for breaking the regimented life of a 'professional' education system and for bringing forth students' voice and their participation in running the college affairs; we did all in our capacity to foster a revolutionary progressive culture among students; we strove for educating in communist ideology and revolutionary politics a specific category of students who had nothing but the individual career as their life-mission; we did our best to integrate students with the life and struggles of workers and working people; we roused them in struggles against injustice, against anti-social activities, and against police atrocities.

In the process, apart from Prakash and Omswaroop, Comrades Tapan Ghosh and Ananda, two of the college students and professional Party cadres who were murdered in cold blood in Asansol jail in 1972, laid down their lives.

Myself, Dhurjati Buxi, Brij Bihari Pandey, Ashish Das Gupta and Gautam Sen are still continuing with the struggle for a revolutionary social change in ways we deem proper.

We did commit mistakes and excesses but we always based ourselves on broad students' support. We retained our distinct identity but at the same time we remained as an integral part of general students, always upholding their issues and remaining at the forefront. Actually here lay our strength and that is why, be it authorities or CPI(M) or police, none succeeded in crushing us and every time we came back. We neither advocated nor practised Che's theory of urban guerilla actions, nor did any 'Kaka'-style super hero emerge from among us. We always remained loyal to the Party mainstream and though we did engage in intensive debates, we had no factions amongst us. We paid lot of attention to reading wide range of Marxist literature and on doing political propaganda. At a juncture, nearly 100 students volunteered to become Party wholetimers and scores of them did go to work in the countryside. Four worker comrades who became wholetimers in the interaction with us in those periods and are still working in our party in responsible positions and good number of workers and their families still retain the fond memories of R E College, Durgapur. The rest is history.

Well, I wrote down all that I could recollect. I must not bother you more with my journey down the memory lane.

(Excerpts from Vinod Mishra's introduction to the booklet containing Bhagat Singh's article “Why am I an atheist”)

Ruthless British rulers thought it better to silence this brilliant brain whose popularity those days was touching the skies. And history stands testimony to the fact that rejecting the public opinion, Gandhi refused to pose cancellation of death sentence to Bhagat Singh as a precondition to Gandhi-Irwin Pact.

Bhagat Singh's popularity was one of the greatest challenges to Gandhi's leadership.... Still more important was the phenomenon of Bhagat Singh's transformation from revolutionary terrorist to a Marxist. This was the main foundation of the silent agreement between the British and the Congress leadership on hanging Bhagat Singh. According to Gandhi's own admission, cancellation of death sentence to Bhagat Singh was not made a precondition for his pact with Irwin, he only wanted the death sentence to be executed before the commencement of Karachi session of Congress. And it was duly done.

Bhagat Singh had deeply studied all the progressive ideologies coming from the West. He had expressed his opinion on almost all the problems of Indian society, be it Brahminical attitude towards untouchables, the tendency of communalism or the nature of Indian union. In those early days, deep influence of anarchist philosophy and its ace proponent Bakunin is well discernable in him.

In this phase he considers religion as a product of human lack of knowledge, fear and lack of confidence.... But in his article “Why I am an atheist” written on 5-6 October 1930, firm grasp of Marxism is discemable in his thinking on the questions of religion and god.

He writes, “About the origin of god, I think that after realising its limitations, weaknesses and shortcomings, mankind has contrived the virtual existence of god in order to bravely face in the moments of trial, to provide encouragement to itself, to bear all the perils with intrepidity and to bind the explosion of prosperity and exuberance whenever it occurs.”

Bhagat Singh proceeds, “When a man becomes self-dependent and a realist, he should cast away revering god and face all such trials and tribulations with boldness which the situation may land him into”, and it was because of this unwavering faith on materialist doctrine that he kissed the gallows with a smile on his face.

Bhagat Singh was not oblivious of the differences among communists on the question of state power. In his article on anarchism he mentions that the ultimate ideal of communism too is directed towards the anarchist idea of rejecting state power. “By revolution we mean ultimately the establishment of a social system where one would not have to encounter these fatal hazards, in which the hegemony of proletariat is accepted, and a world union could save the humanity from the shackles of capitalism and the ravages and predicaments arising out of imperialist wars.”

… Freeing himself of the anarchist concept of elimination of private property, he had begun to realise that only by way of proletarian revolution and socialism would the elimination of private property be really possible.

It is a fact that Bhagat Singh got the inspiration to hurl bombs in the Assembly from the anarchists... Here it must be kept in mind that Bhagat Singh had thrown bomb opposing the bills brought against the communists and the working class. The British government had tabled the two bills in the Assembly. As the speaker announced the passage of other bills, Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt sitting in the gallery hurled the bombs. Raising the slogans “Inquilab Zindabad” (Long live revolution), they distributed leaflets emphasizing their political aims.

Bhagat Singh advised the youth political activists to study Marx and Lenin, work among the working class and peasantry and impart class consciousness to them. He stood for the Leninist concept of party building taking professional revolutionaries, and wrote, “Party must begin its work by conducting propaganda among the masses.... This is very important in order to organise workers and peasants and obtain their sympathy. That party may be named as Communist Party.” This last call issued by Bhagat Singh to the youth is as relevant today as it was those days.

In independent India, the more the government institutions disdain Bhagat Singh and push him to the margins in the history of independence struggle, the more Bhagat Singh found his place in the hearts of the people. Even today, Bhagat Singh's portraits are the most hot sellers of all. His portraits are seen adorning the walls of common people's houses, and thousands of martyr's columns are found in all parts of the country erected at people's own initiative. If there is a single person who can be awarded the status of people's hero in the struggle for independence, it is only Bhagat Singh. Bhagat Singh is not only source of inspiration to the. revolutionary mindset of Indian youth, he is its light house too.

In the thirty years of my political life, I have witnessed a good number of close comrades embracing martyrdom. My tears had dried up braving the martyrdom of those innumerable comrades. Still when I reached Siwan on that fateful day, and the mother wailing beside the corpse of her son Chandrashekhar grabbed my hand and said, “Mishraji, my son Chandu has left us”, I could not check my tears. In our movement we have, on the one hand, youth belonging to dalit, poor peasant families marginalised by the society playing the vanguard role and, on the other, the creamy section of students in established universities of the country marching ahead breaking the barrier of career, getting integrated with people in the lowest rung of the society. Chandrashekhar is a link in that chain of that legacy and probably the first left student leader from Jawaharlal Nehru University who, instead of getting submerged in the limelights of Delhi, preferred to sacrifice his life in the land of Siwan, where he himself was born.

There have been leftist presidents in the JNU who have hardly spent a single night in the huts of peasants and workers, and still they adorn the polit bureau of some party, often to be seen on the television screen roaming in the corridors of power. Chandrashekhar was quite different from all these guys and he shattered the wall between Delhi and Siwan.

In the political crisis that surfaced after 30 March in Bihar, it had become quite necessary to take the relevance of Bihar bandh to the people of the city and a sharp speaker was needed. This was the background in which Chandrashekhar alighted on 31 March to address corner meetings on the streets of Siwan. There was a direction to come back before dusk. We could not anticipate that the attack would take place in this manner in broad daylight, at the busiest square of the city. Failure to take this into consideration, particularly in the context of ruthless character of the brutes we were dealing with, was indeed our weakness.

In Bihar we are witnessing nowadays that the might of administration and police is openly protecting the criminal-mafia gangs. Whenever the so-called banned Ranvir Sena perpetrates an heinous massacre, the police is seen to stand by them. But only a few days ago, when Party Unity men launched attack avenging the (Haibaspur) carnage, the whole of government machinery immediately came to life and brutally killed six youth of 15 to 20 years of age.

I do not want to use the word 'nikamma' (indolent) again because the use of this word once has already created a furore. But what else can be said of a home minister who, instead of issuing any special instruction to arrest the killers of Chandrashekhar, thought his duty over by prevailing upon the prime minister to send rupees one lakh to the mother of Chandu?

We didn't have any direct struggle with Shahabuddin, nor was he on our priority list, because we too knew that for whatsoever reasons, he enjoys support among the Muslim masses. We were engaged in fight against upper caste feudal forces in some other parts of Siwan. But when these forces got mauled at our hands, Shahabuddin himself came up as their patron and took a plunge against us. We don't like to engage ourselves in fighting against someone without a reason. However, we do insist that in case a battle is imposed upon us, we would not be among those who back out. A good lot of our comrades have been martyred, Chandu has sacrificed his life and I know it well that many more of our comrades would have to embrace martyrdom. But, until Shahabuddin's reign of terror is finished off from the soil of Siwan, our challenge will continue.

The martyrdom of Chandu in the battle against Shahabuddin is not just an issue between two persons. Shahabuddin makes the concrete symbol of what we today call criminalisation of politics, one who enjoys the patronage of persons at the helm of power. On the other hand, Chandrashekhar is the symbol of all the clean and honest persons of the society who want to impart a progressive orientation to the country's politics. Therefore, to keep this challenge of Chandrashekhar alive is the common duty of yours, ours and all. In case we fail to press ahead this common struggle from a common platform, we would not be able to stop the death of, nobody knows, how many Chandrashekhars.

Chandrashekhar was killed at the hands of a criminal politician, and now there is a conspiracy being hatched to kill him for a second time. Who can have objection to endeavours like erecting memorials, introducing scholarships, forming trusts, etc. in the memory of Chandrashekhar, but if all this is done at the cost of obliterating his ideals and covering up his killers and their politics, wouldn't it amount to killing Chandrashekhar for the second time? In outrage the people of Siwan have by now punished several members of the killer gang. Our party promises you and the country that combining all the dimensions of struggle, we will certainly avenge Chandrashekhar. The only appeal to you is that you don't allow the conspiracy to kill Chandrashekhar for the second time to succeed.

(Inaugural Speech by Comrade Vinod Mishra at Delhi conference of AISA in February 1994)

At the fag end of 20th century we are witness to a strange spectacle. Historic times seem to be moving back as if history itself is taking two steps backwards. While socialism changes to capitalism, Third world is facing the threat of neo-colonialism. Old definitions too are changing. Conservatives of yesteryears are now called reformers and the radicals of yesteryears are branded as conservatives today.

In this period of historical eclipse you represent a body of students which dares to swim against the tide preparing the ground for the next forward step of history.

Great is the responsibility and hence the challenge too. There will be times when you will find many a friend but there will also be times when you will have to go it alone. Victory belongs only to those who march ahead in the most difficult conditions.

In 70's we have seen the great student upsurge. For the first time in the independent India, inspired by revolutionary ideals and imbued with soaring revolutionary spirits – in Rabindranath Tagore's words: Jiban-mrityuke payer bhritya baniye (bringing life and death under one's command) – thousands of youth clashed with the brutal powers of the state. This immortal saga of valour and sacrifice is you valuable asset, your tradition.

Subsequently, forced by circumstances we had to adjust with the existing institutions of the society arid to quicken the pace of social change from within. You are the product of this second phase of the overall revolutionary movement. In this phase your success has grown out of the several unsuccessful attempts in different parts of India.

A proper combination of the revolutionary spirit of 70's and the tactical expertise of today provides the key to your advance; and this you shall never forget.

In today's context you have to work for a broad united front of Indian people against the increasing imperialist intervention in our country. You will have to be with the toiling masses in the front ranks of struggle for social change and you have to lead the mass of students in their struggle for better education and guaranteed employment.

Are these tasks mutually exclusive? Or does their simple arithmetical sum make up an integral whole? I think both these ideas are incorrect. Practice in due course shall help you combine various tasks in a proper manner, yet it can be said for sure that participation in struggle for social change provides the vital link in reaching at a comprehensive solution of the problem.

Just as the revolutionary character of a youth is determined by his integration with the toiling masses, so also the revolutionary credentials of a student-youth organisation depend very much on its active role in the struggles for social change.

All surveys and ideas that raise doubts regarding the revolutionary potential of students and youth are wrong—utterly wrong. Students are not a community standing in isolation with the society nor a community superimposed upon the society. The student community, is rather a mirror where subterranean social strings are clearly visible. Your victories in UP university elections, for example were the first signs of the receding wave of communal hysteria.

Despite all consumerist influence, in the backdrop of deepening social and national contradictions, students may, at the first instance, and that too quite easily, shed off such influences. You must keep faith on the revolutionary energy of students and youth and must keep faith on India's toiling masses.

Our party believes in pointing out only the general course that the student-youth movement should take. Owing to their distinguished features, their youthful dynamism, students and youth shall traverse this course in their own peculiar way. It is neither possible nor desirable to dictate every step in advance.

In your long march a number of forts have crumbled, a number of Maths have fallen, but many more still await to be smashed.

With hopes for newer victories, I, on behalf of the Party Central Committee, greet your Conference.

With thanks.

On the question of education and employment, this national convention of AISA is certainly a very well-timed step. Few days back I read in the newspapers that on this very question another national convention attended by about 1500 participants belonging to 14 student-youth organisations could only decide that the Prime Minister Mr. Deve Gowda should be given a memorandum. The newspaper headlines read Student Convention displeased with the government. There was no announcement to launch a movement or give an ultimatum to the government. Such a big student-youth force could have put enormous pressure on the government through its movements but from somewhere or the other their hands were tied. And the biggest reason for this is that the parties to which these organisations are attached to, are either part of or are supporters to the government. This CMP that the student-youth organisation have criticised has been jointly framed by these parties and so it would have been better if these organisations instead of giving Deve Gowda a memorandum had submitted the same to their own parties. As against this, you have come up with a movemental programme by adding that the students would be forced to go into direct action if the government fails to respond to the student-youths' demands within a given time. This is a welcome step and I feel extremely glad inaugurating this convention.

You saw that as Com. Harkishan Singh Surjeet put it, that 77% of the people have voted against communalism. The BJP interpreted that again 77% people rejected the Congress. And the third view was that 77% have voted against the third front that was formed with JD, SP, LF etc. Hence, it is obvious that no formation is able to define the people's mandate in its favour. In these elections we saw that some questions emerged very prominently. BJP had claimed that with its slogan of Hindutva, its concept of Hindutva, it would establish a new national unity at the all-India level. But we saw that the influence of its Hindutva was not seen anywhere else leave the Hindi-speaking areas and some parts of western India. This raises an important question – Is Hindutva that national aspect, that thread which can unite the whole of India? At least the elections have proved that such is certainly not the case. And if BJP had to take the support of other parties to form the government then here you would see that all those demands that were directly connected to Hindutva including that of Ram Mandir were dropped only to help them form the government. We communists have always asserted that India is a nation of many nationalities who have their own cultural identities, regional aspirations and demands for autonomy. With all these nationalities we have to build a nation in which everyone participates in developing Indian nationalism not against their own wishes. Forcible attempt to impose the interests of one region, one stream or one idea, over the whole country would never lead to establish any national unity and instead there are dangers of breaking up whatever national unity exists today.

We saw in the past that a Mandal-based alliance with the slogan of social justice was forged between dalits, backwards and Muslims all over India in an attempt to create a new stream and give a challenge to communalism, but as we found in these elections this stream too could not advance further. There was a division among the backward forces and in many places its benefit went to BJP. We also saw that there were sharp contradictions between dalits and backwards, because of which BSP, and SP fought against each other in UP. And in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and right up to Orissa and other states this Mandal-based third force could not have any effect. This project of unity did not succeed but the emerging kulak section from amongst the backward castes tried to prevail over this coalition, resulting in increased fighting between dalits and backwards and even within backwards too, between that section which has acquired wealth, and others who have been left out in the process of development, the contradiction sharpened. That is why any unity between dalits and backwards could not sustain.

I mentioned these questions in front of you because being students you also represent that section of the intelligentsia which has to think about its own education, own problems and at the same time think about the whole nation.

This people's mandate which I said was not a clear one, resulted in an opportunist coalition. The third front has formed a common understanding with Congress and on that basis they are running the government. There is an opportunist friendship between Congress and the third force. This is how our ruling classes have brought out a solution to the crisis which had emerged as an election issue. There were movement against Congress during the election campaign and also during the last five years. But finally this government is being run along with the same Congress or with its support.

We also saw that among the LF parties, CPI preferred to directly participate in the government. Though CPI(M) did not participate in the government but then is was there to prepare the common programme of the government or set its policies, or stand in the government's favour in the Lok Sabha or as a whole, since it is a government of the UF and being in the UF itself, it is, even though indirectly, still part of the government in one way or the other. This has raised a new question because these forces of the left are slowly advancing this social-democratic ideology that India does not require any revolution and only through reforms by operating from within the government can we change the society and the country. The question is to stand against this social democratic ideology that is being spread in society. And this is why we think that revolutionary left and other revolutionary forces who think that in the last analysis for any fundamental change in the society revolution is the only path, all these forces have to take up a special role today and in that as student-youths you have to take up the leading position. In today's situation you are the only left-oppositional force and you have to step out to lead this struggle.

Ever since the Soviet Union collapsed and the communist movement world over faced many a problem, we saw that many ideologies flourished and according to them, one can no longer look at history in a holistic way, you can not find a rule for the history. Further, it says that there exists a particular system in society like the capitalist system is entirely wrong. Neither can you understand a complete system nor can you find a rule to the whole system. All earlier ideologies used to study the whole society and history in its totality. They tried to look for the real reasons behind the various problems in society and in this way tried to change society. The new ideologies say that the old ones have become useless and are not required now. They say that at the most you can in a scattered way protest against this or that exploitation or injustice but nothing more than that. These ideas are being called post-modernist ideas. It is being said even to this extent that if you cannot stop a rape, enjoy it. These ideas are coming from the West that since it is impossible to change this capitalist system, one should enjoy this capitalist system, one should live in it and enjoy the pleasure of consumerism. This one argument which is blocking the students, youths and intellectuals from moving ahead in their struggles. As against this the Marxist and progressive ideologies say that there are various problems related to different section in societies, their struggles are different and we should surely wage ail these struggles but at the same time the whole history can be explained; there are various rules in history and one can find these rules, the rules behind changing a system, and based on this a great unity of the toiling sections of society could be forged and thus society can be changed. At the end, the whole human race can be emancipated. This declaration of Marxism needs to be kept alive and therefore at the level of ideology when there is an attack from all directions, from forces of communalism or liberalism or from post-modernism, to keep alive our revolutionary struggles, it is important that we keep alive the correct ideology.

Seen in the total perspective students are not just for themselves but for changing the whole system. These struggles for social change are very cruel, tough and brutal as you saw in the latest killing by feudal forces in Bihar. The question is not just about the struggle for the poor but it is also for the progress of the nation. You will find in history that only those nations have developed where feudalism has been wiped out.

At the end, I would say that at many places in India caste mobilisations are taking place, parties are being formed and elections are being fought. Many people say that even among students one has to take recourse to caste based mobilisation so as to win union elections. This has been called social engineering. If student movement gets dependent on such caste equations it will lose its vanguard role. You have to fight against all such negative tendencies existing in the society and take new light into the society. If India has to move forward the student community or intellectuals have to rise above these backward and negative ideas and also against feudal forces which are trying to take you back to Brahminical pattern of thought so as to revive the old feudal past. I am sure AISA will lead this movement of students.

Inquilab Zindabad!

 (The Speech delivered by Vinod Mishra at the National Conference of Revolutionary Youth Association)

As an ideal of patriotism the second name we find in the post-independence period, and that is Charu Majumdar. He saw a great dream of a democratic India, a socialist India, and he roused the whole generation of the youth community with that dream. In my view, after independence there has been no leader who could inspire youth in such a large number with a dream and motivate them in the politics of self-sacrifice. Hence I suggest that in order to take a lesson of patriotism, the second personality, the second great hero is Charu Majumdar. Often Charu Majumdar told the youth that only those would remain revolutionary who would integrate with workers and peasant, who would work in the interest of workers and peasants. That is why I appeal to you to let the teachings of Bhagat Singh and Charu Majumdar become your guide in the matter of patriotism.

The British had hanged Bhagat Singh in the dark of night and themselves cremated his body. Charu Majumdar too was murdered in the Lalbazar police lock-up and his body was cremated under police guard. The lesson of patriotism has to be learnt from these two great heroes.

The second slogan of yours is social justice. The scope of social justice is quite large. Since the bourgeois revolution in France, social justice is in vogue, all the progressive forces raise this slogan. But in our country, for quite some time this slogan has been considerably restricted in scope. Nowadays this slogan is looked at in the narrow context of how to increase the share of the privileged upper stratum of backward castes in the bureaucracy, in the state machinery. As a consequence you have seen how all the forces that emerged in the name of social justice find their symbol in Laloo Yadav. He has betrayed the movement, saved his seat with the help of Congress, and now he has landed in the jail. You must fight against this narrowing down of social justice. You must fight with a greater perspective of social justice: to bring the most oppressed, most wretched, dalit and exploited sections of the society, who find there place in the larger scope of social justice, to the forefront of political mainstream, to make them masters of their own destiny; and to elevate them to an equal footing in political, economic and social spheres.

In this perspective you must keep in mind that all the parties and political leaders in our country, all the forces that have come to the fore in the name of social justice or in the name of dalit awakening, all of them have got degenerated. What we witness now is that communalism is on the rise throughout the country. Be it in Assam, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh or Tamil Nadu, wherever dalits are being attacked, everywhere dalits, the poor, wretched people and youth are victims of repression. Nowhere any progressive leadership is to be seen. Left forces like CPI and CPI(M) have joined a United Front government, the remote control of which lies in the hands of the Congress president Sitaram Kesri.

I saw in the newspapers that a martyrs' column has been erected at Baranagar. I came to know that Jyoti Basu has spoken a lot of things there. He said that it was Congress who perpetrated the Kashipur-Baranagar massacre. As a matter of fact, Jyoti Basu has tried to whitewash the historic reality that not only Congress but the local leadership of CPI(M) too had its hand in the massacre. Therefore, from this conference you demand an impartial enquiry of Kashipur-Baranagar massacre. From this enquiry it will be revealed as to who were the persons directly linked with the carnage. We cannot resign ourselves the way CPI(M) wants to maintain its rule by utilising our martyrs. This is certainly an important question. Jyoti babu has further said that if Naxalites join them, forces of the left will get a further boost. They have joined us in Bihar. But we have always told them in no uncertain terms that in West Bengal we cannot march together. Because here you are in the government, and you are following all sorts of anti-people policies.

I must say that today there is a void in the place to be occupied by social justice and progressive forces. Today all the political parties – Janata Dal, Samajwadi Party, even the left parties – are increasingly losing their relevance. The anarchy and disorder that the country has today fallen into gives us an indication to carry the revolutionary struggle forward. It is you who must fill this void. On this count the youth organisation has a big role to play. Today the whole country is in search of an alternative force, a fighting force. Only the youth organisation can fill this gap. For, our struggle is the struggle for a bright future and only youth can wage the struggle for a bright future. Youth are the future of the country, future of the society. Only youth can become vanguards in the struggle for a bright future and none else. Our struggle demands self-sacrifice, it demands great sacrifices to be undertaken and only youth have that legacy of self-sacrifice. Youth always go ahead to participate in the struggles that call for self-sacrifice. Our struggle demands advancing with a new thinking, as the old thinking has become outmoded. Today the country needs new thinking, newer realisations and newer experiments. Youth always come forward to grasp new thinking. That is why I place very much hope on your youth organisation. Not for the conference sake, nor in the ceremonial sense, in reality the overall situation of the country demands that youth must come forward. March forward in the struggle to build an independent India free from foreign bondage, a democratic India — this is the call of the day. So this conference is quite relevant. I hope that after making an overall consideration of the situation, if you start taking primary steps now, within two to four years your Revolutionary Youth Association will become one of the main youth organisations of the country.

(Produced in the high tide of Naxalbari uprising, this song was Com. Vinod Mishra's favourite one)

The day is not far off when

Motherland gets liberated

Look, horizon in the east

Starts sparkling in red sun

Fanning out in four corners

Glare sweep off the gloom

Bathing in crimson downpour

Motherland dances in joy

Toilers oppressed for ages

Chant the liberation chorus

Fluttering in azure sky

Red flag glares in glory

That day we must usher in

Comrades, pour all your might

The day is not far off when

Motherland gets liberated

India's great, we're great

Indians India belongs to us

(Text of the speech delivered by Vinod Mishra at the Third National Conference of AISA)

Comrade Chandrashekhar is no longer with us but his killer the notorious Shahabuddin is sitting in parliament. CBI enquiry that was instituted to investigate Chandrashekhar's killing has been abruptly stopped and Sahabuddin is moving scot-free. BJP government at the centre doesn't seem to be interested in pursuing the investigations and one doubts whether some kind of clandestine deal has been struck at the high levels! It is, therefore, an important task before AISA and before the student and youth in general to continue your agitation till the guilty is punished. In this context it is important to continue the popular movement to drag him out of parliament Let Chandrashekhar's memory remain alive in your hearts and let it guide you in completing his unfinished tasks.

AISA more than a formal organisation is a movement in making. It wasn't formed from any closed-door party meeting just as the party's wing. It emerged out of the revolutionary stream of the student movement and that's why it is so different from the crowd of student organisations. Under the guidance of the revolutionary ideology it charted out it's own course of action and deepened its roots in several parts of the country particularly emerging as the foremost left student organisation in the Hindi heartland. In 70's we had a powerful revolutionary student-youth movement that rocked West Bengal and affected almost all campuses. In those days no formal student organisation was there and nor did we contest union elections. Campus issues were hardly taken up and it was the call for direct action for plunging into the great battle of social and political transformation. And yet there was a tremendous response. Well, the situation has radically changed in all these years. You have a formal organisation, you contest, and quite vigorously too in the student union elections and also you pay much of your attention on campus issues. All these are important no doubt but you should not get bogged down in them. Once the organisational paraphernalia of high ranking leaders, the constitutional formalities and the rigidity of structure becomes dominant you often turn introvert getting bogged down in internal bickering, in hankering after posts, in factional squabbling and tend to lose the movemental edge. AISA has been a movement and an important challenge before the new generation of AISA leaders and cadres is, therefore, to keep alive this phenomenon.

You have before you a number of challenging tasks in present day conditions.

India as a free nation began its journey with the high sounding slogans of socialism, land reforms, secularism etc. but after fifty years we find all of them replaced by the slogan of building a theocratic state, a Hindu Rashtra. This is a great tragedy that has befallen the country after half a century of the demise of colonial rule. The forces who had risen in recent years on Mandalite and the federal plank and were hailed as the antidote to the saffron project have themselves fallen from grace. For example, here in Bihar, the so-called forces of social justice under the leadership of Mr. Laloo Yadav have turned Bihar into a veritable lumpen raj. As a result while students and youth as well as the working classes remain divided on caste and regional lines, the march of saffron continues unabated and often on the fodder supplied to it by these very regional and Mandal forces. It is AISA's duty to rebuild the student unity cutting across caste, communal and regional divide. You have to forge the student unity on an all India scale a unity that can reshape the future of the country.

Secondly, we have seen the Vajpayee government blatantly changing the course of India's foreign policy and working for turning India into a stooge of American imperialism. Government, the other day, justified US missile strikes against Sudan and Afghanistan. After Pokhran tests the PM in his letter to Clinton had proposed a strategic tie-up with America against China and Islamic countries. They are also contemplating signing CTBT. Despite Swadeshi rhetoric the pace of mortgaging the country's economy to the multinationals has only become faster. It is the foremost duty of AISA to mobilise students in anti-imperialist struggles.

Thirdly AISA must stand in solidarity with all democratic struggles and oppose all anti-people policies irrespective of whether the colour of the government is saffron, green or even red.

Finally, I would like to remind you that the movement of 70's had a passion, a determination to weed out all that was old, all that was rotten and bring about a radical social change. We were in a hurry those days and our preparations were almost nil. What we thought of revolution turned out to be a rehearsal only. Those days are over. You are proceeding through a different route and that is okay. Yet, in a nutshell combining the revolutionary spirit of the 70's with the realism of the day is the foremost task before you and I am confident that this conference will ponder over this question.

AISA is the name of a glorious chapter of the revolutionary student movement of this Decade and students feel pride in identifying themselves with AISA. The tasks assigned to you are not merely party's decisions and are neither mechanically worked out. They are the tasks assigned to you by the history itself and you must prove yourself equal to them.